Discover
Assemble source evidence and the business context that may affect the value range.
For valuers
Get through the evidence, adjustments, methods and sensitivities in hours rather than rebuilding each view by hand. The Analyst lays out data-based valuation analysis step by step, with traceable sources and assumptions built for IVS and APES 225 scrutiny. You choose the method, challenge the assumptions and control the issued conclusion.
Illustrative workflow · Advisor judgement stays in the loop
See the platform
Watch the narrated demonstration for valuers.
For valuers 2:26 narrated demo
The workflow
Assemble source evidence and the business context that may affect the value range.
Compare methods, adjustments and simulated paths, then prepare material for the valuer's review.
Revisit the value drivers when financial results, plans or assumptions change.
More productive work
Repeated data gathering, model revisions and output preparation can consume an engagement. The Analyst keeps inputs, methods and outputs connected, saving hours of assembly so the valuer can focus on judgement and serve more clients.
Valuation and the CGT transition
For relevant assets held across Australia's 1 July 2027 CGT transition, market value immediately before that date can matter.
The Analyst assembles financial evidence, adjustments, method choices, sensitivities and strategic scenarios into step-by-step valuation analysis. You review each assumption, set the scope and method, and control the conclusion issued to the client.
Use the same connected intelligence to show how performance, risk and execution choices may change future value.
Explore valuation Read the Australian Treasury CGT explainer ↗Professional rigour
Inspect source figures, adjustments, method selection, calculations, sensitivities and reviewer decisions in sequence. The documented methodology supports valuer-led work under IVS internationally and APES 225 in Australia. The valuer determines scope, applies the relevant requirements, exercises professional judgement and owns the issued conclusion.